Problems of the diagnosis and surgical treatment of primary heart tumors
R.M. Vіtovskyi, V.M. Beshliaga
References
1. Adamira M., Justik P., Ulman J. et al. Two sporadic infected cardiac myxomas in 1 patient // Tex. Heart Inst. J.– 2011.– Vol. 38, N 2.– P. 191–193.
2. Diaz A., Di Salvo C., Lawrence D., Hayward M. Left atrial and right ventricular myxoma: an uncommon presentation of a rare tumour // Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg.– 2011.–Vol. 12, № 4.– P. 622–623.
3. Guenther F., Siepe M., Schlensak C. et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Recurrence of a familial giant multilocular cardiac myxoma in a patient with Carney’s complex // Circulation.– 2011.– Vol. 123, N 8.– P. 929–932.
4. Hallward G., Valchanov K. An unexpected pre-operative diagnosis // Eur. J. Echocardiogr.– 2010.– Vol. 11, N 1.– P. 89–90.
5. Hill M., Cherry C., Maloney M., Midyette P. Surgical resection of atrial myxomas // AORN J.– 2010. − Vol. 92, № 4.– P. 393–406.
6. Hrabak-Paar M., Hübner M., Stern-Padovan R., Lušić M. Hemangioma of the interatrial septum: CT and MRI features // Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol.– 2011.– Vol. 34 (Suppl. 2).– P. S90–S393.
7. Konagai N., Cho M., Shigematsu H. Left atrial myxoma associated with acute myocardial infarction and multiple cerebral infarctions: Report of a case // Surg. Today.– 2010.– Vol. 40, N 12.– P. 1159–1163.
8. Kumar P., Garg A. Left ventricular myxoma in a child: a case report / // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. – 2011.– Vol. 12, № 3.– P. 23.
9. Nowak T., Stachurski A., Rachwalik M. et al. Big myxoma of the left atrium suggesting pulmonary embolism // Kardiol. Pol.– 2010. − Vol. 68, N 6.– P. 695–696.
10. Oliveira R., Branco L., Galrinho A. et al. Cardiac myxoma: a 13-year experience in echocardiographic diagnosis // Rev. Port. Cardiol. – 2010. − Vol. 29, N 7.– P. 1087–1100.
11. Park J., Song J.M., Shin E. et al. Cystic cardiac mass in the left atrium: hemorrhage in myxoma // Circulation.– 2011.– Vol. 123, N 10.– P. 368–369.
12. Seder C.W., Sakwa M.P., Shannon F.L. Left ventricular myxoma resection with minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction // J. Heart Valve Dis.– 2010.– Vol. 19, N 4.– P. 533–535.
13. Yavuz S., Eris C., Sezen M. et al. Recurrent multiple cardiac myxomas // Bratisl. Lek. Listy.– 2010.– Vol. 111, N 10.– P. 549–551.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Idioventricular rhythm of the heart
М.T. Vatutin, A.М. Shevelok, V.О. Karapysh
References
1. Анестезиология и реаниматология. Руководство для врачей / Под. ред. проф. Ю.С. Полушина.– СПб, 2004.– 720 с.
2. Атеросклероз: сборник научных трудов Новокузнецкого и Ленинградского ГИДУВов / под ред. Б.В. Ильинский и Г.А. Гольдберг.– СПб, 1973.– С. 279–281.
3. Бобров В.А., Долженко М.Н., Довганич Н.В. и соавт. Реперфузионные аритмии: механизмы формирования // Укр. кардіол. журнал.– 2003.– № 3.– С. 99–103.
4. Бобров В.А., Долженко М.Н., Довганич Н.В. Реперфузионные аритмии: клиническая значимость, методы коррекции // Укр. кардіол. журнал.– 2003.– № 4.– С. 103–107.
5. Диагностика и лечение первичной гипертрофической кардиомиопатии. Национальное руководство / под ред. Комиссарова С.М., Вайханская Т.Г., Шкет А.П.– Минск, 2010.– С. 19–21.
6. Долженко М.Н., Довганич Н.В. Реперфузионные аритмии: новый взгляд на старую проблему // Медицина неотложных состояний.– 2008.– Т. 3, № 16.– С. 43–47.
7. Кушаковский М.С. Аритмии сердца. Руководство для врачей. – Изд. 2-е, дополн., расшир. и частично перераб.– СПб, 1998.– С. 171–175.
8. Лукьянова И.Ю., Евдокимова Н.Р., Короткевич И.А. Механизм развития «парадоксальной реакции» на введение атропина у животных после перевязки задней межжелудочковой ветви правой коронарной артерии // Вестник Новгородского Государственного университета.– 2012.– № 67.– С. 67–70.
9. Мазур Н.А. Пароксизмальные тахикардии.– М., 2005.– С. 118–121.
10. Мазур Н.А. Практическая кардиология.– М., 2009.– С. 337–338.
11. Мурашко В.В. Электрокардиография: Учебн. пособие / В.В. Мурашко, А.В. Струтынский.– 8-е изд.– М., 2007.– С.122–124, 180–181.
12. Недоступ А., Благова О. Лечение нарушений ритма сердца кордароном // Ответы на актуальные вопросы.– 2005.– № 8.– С. 20–27.
13. Ольбинская Л.И., Сизова Ж.М., Царьков И.А. Желудочковые нарушения ритма сердца у больных хронической сердечной неостаточностью: возможности ингибиторов ангиотензинпревращающего фермента // Сердечная недостаточность.– 2001.– № 5.– С. 211–213.
14. Орлов В.Н. Руководство по ЭКГ / В.Н. Орлов.– М., 1997.– С. 417– 420.
15. Пархоменко А.Н., Брыль Ж.В. Патофизиологические механизмы ишемического и реперфузионного повреждения миокарда в экспериментальных исследованиях // Укр. кардіол. журн.– 2000.– № 5–6.– С. 95–99.
16. Розенштраух Л.В., Кузьмин В.С. Ионные механизмы действия антиаритмических препаратов III класса // Кардиология.– 2010.– № 7.– С. 49–61.
17. Сидорова Н.Ю., Сидорова Т.Ф., Вишняков А.М. и соавт. Случай идиопатического ускоренного идиовентрикулярного ритма, индуцированного вагусной активностью // Вестник аритмологии.– 2004.– № 35.– С. 81.
18. Угдыжекова Д.С. Опиатическая модуляция устойчивости сердца к аритмогенным воздействиям // Патологическая физиология и экспериментальная терапия.– 2002.– № 1.– С. 26–28.
19. Фогельсон Л.И. Заболевания проводящей системы сердца (аритмии сердца) / Л.И. Фогельсон, К.Ю. Юлдашев.– Ташкент, 1981. – С.176.
20. Ali Z., Laurijssens B., Ostenfeld T. et al. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic profiling of P2X7 receptor allosteric modulator GSK1482160 in Healthy Human subjects // Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.– 2012.– Vol. 75 (1).– P. 197–207.
21. Anatoliotaki M., Papagiannis J., Stefanaki S. et al. Accelerated ventricular rhythm in the neonatal period: a review and two new cases in asymptomatic infants with an apparently normal heart // Acta Paediatr.– 2004.– Vol. 93 (10).– P. 1397–1400.
22. Bauman J.L., DiDomenico R.J. Cocaine-induced channelopathies: emerging evidence on the multiple mechanisms of sudden death // J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther.– 2002.– Vol. 7 (3).– P. 195–202.
23. Behringer W., Sterz F., Domanovits H. et al. Percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass for therapy resistant cardiac arrest from digoxin overdose // Resuscitation.– 1998.– Vol. 37 (1).– P. 47–50.
24. Bonnemeier H., Ortak J., Wiegand U.K. et al. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm in the post-thrombolytic era: incidence, prognostic implications, and modulating mechanisms after direct percutaneous coronary intervention // Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol.– 2005.– Vol. 10 (2).– P. 179–187.
25. Brady W.J., Swart G., DeBehnke D.J. et al. The efficacy of atropine in the treatment of hemodynamically unstable bradycardia and atrioventricular block: prehospital and emergency department considerations // Resuscitation.– 1999.– Vol. 41 (1).– P. 47–55.
26. Buĭmov G.A., Maksimov I.V., Perchatkin V.A. et al. Effect of the bioantioxidant histochrome on myocardial injury in reperfusion therapy on patients with myocardial infarction // Ter. Arkh.– 2002.– Vol. 74 (8).– P. 12–16.
27. Cai J., Yi F.F., Li Y.H. et al. Adenoviral gene transfer of HCN4 creates a genetic pacemaker in pigs with complete atrioventricular block // Life Sci.– 2007.– Vol. 80 (19).– P. 1746–1753.
28. Canki-Klain N., Récan D., Milicić D. et al. Clinical variability and molecular diagnosis in a four-generation family with X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy // Croat. Med. J.– 2000.– Vol. 41 (4).– P. 389–395.
29. Chiladakis J.A., Vlachos N., Patsouras N. et al. Usefulness of reperfusion ventricular arrhythmias in non-invasive prediction of early reperfusion and sustained coronary artery patency in acute myocardial infarction // J. Thromb. Thrombolysis.– 2001.– Vol. 12 (3).– P. 231–236.
30. Chiladakis J.A., Pashalis A., Patsouras N. et al. Autonomic patterns preceding and following accelerated idioventricular rhythm in acute myocardial infarction // Cardiology.– 2001.– Vol. 96 (1).– P. 24–31.
31. Coven G., Arpesella R., Ciceri M. et al. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section // Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.– 2003.– Vol. 12 (2).– P. 121–125.
32. De Souza D., Riera A.R., Bombig M.T. et al. Electrocardiogra phic changes by accidental hypothermia in an urban and a tropical region // J. Electrocardiol. – 2007.– Vol. 40 (1).– P. 47–52.
33. Derakhchan K., Cardinal R., Brunet S. et al. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardias induced by D-sotalol and phenylephrine in canine preparations of atrioventricular block: initiation in the conduction system followed by spatially unstable reentry // Cardiovasc. Res.– 1998.– Vol. 38 (3).– P. 617–630.
34. Domanovits H., Nikfardjam M., Janata K. et al. Restoration of coronary blood flow by single bolus injection of the GPIIb/ IIIa receptor antagonist c7E3 Fab in a patient with acute myocardial infarction of recent onset // Clin. Cardiol.– 1998.– Vol. 21 (7).– P. 525–528.
35. Drago F., Fazio G., Di Pino A. et al. The total absence of atrial automaticity in a child with sinus node dysfunction // Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc Med.– 2007.– Vol. 4 (9).– P. 513–517.
36. Dunnink A., Sharif S., Oosterhoff P., Winckels S. et al. Anesthesia and arrhythmogenesis in the chronic atrioventricular block dog model // J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.– 2010.– Vol. 55 (6).– P. 601–608.
37. Eich C., Bräuer A., Timmermann A. et al. Outcome of 12 drowned children with attempted resuscitation on cardiopulmonary bypass: an analysis of variables based on the «Utstein Style for Drowning» // Resuscitation.– 2007.– Vol. 75 (1).– P. 42–52.
38. Farkas A.S., Makra P., Csík N. et al. The role of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, I(Na) and I(CaL) in the genesis of dofetilideinduced torsades de pointes in isolated, AV-blocked rabbit hearts // Br. J. Pharmacol.– 2009.– Vol. 156 (6).– P. 920–932.
39. Freire G., Dubrow I. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm in newborns: a worrisome but benign entity with or without congenital heart disease // Pediatr. Cardiol.– 2008.– Vol. 29 (2).– P. 457–462.
40. Fujita Y. et al. Five cases of aconite poisoning: toxicokinetics of aconitines // J. Anal. Toxicol.– 2007.– Vol. 31 (3).– P. 132–137.
41. Gul E.E., Erdogan H.I., Yıldırım O. et al. Hyperkalemiainduced accelerated idioventricular rhythm in a patient with acute renal failure // Ren. Fail.– 2012.– Vol. 34 (4).– P. 543–544.
42. Grimm W., Hoffmann J., Menz V. et al. Significance of accelerated idioventricular rhythm in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy // Am. J. Cardiol.– 2000.– Vol. 85 (7).– P. 899–904.
43. Heper G., Ozensoy U., Korkmaz M.E. Persistent atrial standstill and idioventricular rhythm in a patient with thalassemia intermedia // Turk. Kardiyol. Dern. Ars.– 2009.– Vol. 37 (4).– P. 256–259.
44. Ilia R., Amit G., Cafri C. et al. Reperfusion arrhythmias during coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction predict ST-segment resolution // Coron. Artery Dis.– 2003.– Vol. 14 (6).– P. 439–441.
45. Jurkovicová O., Cagán S. Reperfusion arrhythmias // Bratisl. Lek. Listy.– 1998.– Vol. 99 (3–4).– P. 162–171.
46. Kashiwakura Y., Cho H.C., Barth A.S. et al. Gene transfer of a synthetic pacemaker channel into the heart: a novel strategy for biological pacing // Circulation.– 2006.– Vol. 114 (16).– P. 1682–1686.
47. Lin G., Cai J., Jiang H., Shen H. et al. Biological pacemaker created by fetal cardiomyocyte transplantation // J. Biomed. Sci.– 2005.– Vol. 12 (3).– P. 513–519.
48. Marret E., Pruszkowski O., Deleuze A. et al. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm associated with desflurane administration // Anesth. Analg.– 2002.– Vol. 95 (2).– P. 319–321.
49. Maruyama K., Mochizuki N., Hara K. High-degree atrioventricular block after the administration of atropine for sinus arrest during anesthesia // Can. J. Anaesth.– 2003.– Vol. 50 (5) .– P. 528–529.
50. Mikhailova S.D., Glushchenko N.V., Semushkina T.M. et al. Peculiarities of ischemic cardiac arrhythmias in cats against the background of stimulation of sensorimotor cortex and administration of selective opiate receptor agonists // Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.– 2000.– Vol. 129 (5).– P. 623–624.
51. Moroz V.M., Lipnitskii T.N. Study of pathogenesis of ventricular arrhythmia in experimental rats by separation of sinus and ventricular substitutional rhythms // Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.– 2006.– Vol. 141 (4).– P. 400–403.
52. Nasir J.M. et al. Symptomatic hypervagotonia in a highly conditioned athlete // Clin. J. Sport.– 2007.– Vol. 1.– P. 70–71.
53. Negrusz-Kawecka M, Gajek J. Idioventricular rhythm in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an indicator of perfusion or ischemic symptom // Pol. Merkur. Lekarski.– 2000.– Vol. 8 (44).– P. 80–83.
54. Osmancik P.P., Stros P., Herman D. In-hospital arrhythmias in patients with acute myocardial infarction - the relation to the reperfusion strategy and their prognostic impact // Acute Card. Care.– 2008.– Vol. 10 (1).– P. 15–25.
55. Ozdemir O., Ceylan Y., Koksoy A.Y. et al. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm associated with propranolol treatment in a child // Cardiol. J.– 2012.– Vol. 19 (3).– P. 330–333.
56. Ozeki S., Utsunomiya T., Matsuo S. et al. Pilsicainide intoxication in a patient with dehydration // Jpn. Circ. J.– 1999.– Vol. 63 (3).– P. 219–222.
57. Pauschinger M., Badorff C., Kühl U. et al. Syncope in 3rd degree atrioventricular block. Detection of virus genome in the myocardium // Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr.– 1998.– Vol. 123 (48).– P. 1443–1446.
58. Remmelink M., Delewi R., Yong Z.Y. et al. More pronounced diastolic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with accelerated idioventricular rhythm after reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention // J. Invasive Cardiol.– 2010.– Vol. 22 (12).– P. 574–578.
59. Riera A.R., Barros R.B., de Sousa F.D. et al. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm: history and chronology of the main discoveries // Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J.– 2012.– Vol. 10 (1).– P. 40–48.
60. Ryu H.Y., Kim J.Y., Lim H.K. et al. Bupivacaine induced cardiac toxicity mimicking an acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction // Yonsei Med. J.– 2007.– Vol. 48 (2).– P. 331–336.
61. Schwock J., Thiele H., Wittekind Ch. Sudden cardiac death in a case of systemic sarcoidosis // Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr.– 2003.– Vol. 128 (1–2).– P. 26–30.
62. Sorgente A., Yazaki Y., Capulzini L. et al. Accelerated idioventricular rhythm during ajmaline test: a case report // Indian Pacing Electrophysiol. J.–010.– Vol. 10 (10).– P. 474–478.
63. Terkelsen C.J., Sørensen J.T., Kaltoft A.K. et al. Prevalence and significance of accelerated idioventricular rhythm in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention // Am. J. Cardiol.– 2009.– Vol. 104 (12).– P. 1641–1646.
64. Thakar S., Chandra P., Pednekar M. et al. Complete heart block following a blow on the chest by a soccer ball: a rare manifestation of commotio cordis // Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol.– 2012.– Vol. 17(3).– P. 280–282.
65. Ufberg J.W., Clark J.S. Bradydysrhythmias and atrioventricular conduction blocks // Emerg. Med. Clin. North. Am.–2006.– Vol. 24 (1).– P. 1–9.
66. Vaturi M., Birnbaum Y. The use of the electrocardiogram to identify epicardial coronary and tissue reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction // J. Thromb. Thrombolysis.– 2000.– Vol. 10 (1).– P. 5–14.
67. Wagoner D.R., Bond M. Reperfusion arrhythmias: new insights into the role of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger // J. Moll. Cell. Cardiology.– 2001.– Vol. 33.– P. 2071–2074.
68. Wang S., Zhu W., Hamilton R.M. et al. Diagnosis-specific characteristics of ventricular tachycardia in children with structurally normal hearts // Heart Rhythm.– 2010.– Vol. 7 (12).– P. 1725–1731.
69. Wehrens X.H., Doevendans P.A., Ophuis T.J. et al. A comparison of electrocardiographic changes during reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction by thrombolysis or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty // Am. Heart J.– 2003.– Vol. 139 (3).– P. 430–436.
70. Wu E.T., Huang S.C., Chi N.H. et al. Idioventricular rhythm induced by therapeutic hypothermia // Resuscitation.– 2008.– Vol. 76 (3).– P. 471–473.
71. Yokomuro H., Li R.K., Mickle D.A. et al. Transplantation of cryopreserved cardiomyocytes // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2001.– Vol. 121 (1).– P. 98–107.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
First case of successful use extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in child of the first year of life with respiratory failure
B.M. Todurov, O.M. Dovgan, O.M. Duzhyna, I.О. Aksionova, V.I. Borisova, S.M. Sudakevych, V.V. Shmyrko, T.V. Kropyvko, N.V. Liovina
References
1. Bahrami van Meurs. ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure: seminars in perinatology // 2005.– Vol. 29.– P. 15–23.
2. Bennett C. UK Collaborative Randomized Trial of Neonatal ECMO: follow-up to age 4 years // Lancet.– 2001.– Vol. 357.– P. 1094–1096.
3. Chapman R.L., Peterec S.M., Bizzarro M.J., Mercurio M.R. Patient selection for neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: beyond severity of illness // J. Perinatol.– 2009.– Vol. 29.– P. 606–611.
4. Fenton K.N., Webber S.A., Danford D.A. et al. Long-term survival after pediatric cardiac transplantation and postoperative ECMO support // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2003.– Vol. 76.– P. 843–847.
5. Kim E.S., Stolar C.J. ECMO in the newborn // Amer. J. Perinatol.– 2000.– Vol. 17.– P. 345–356.
6. Rais-Bahrami K., Wagner A., Coffman C. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in ECMO vs near-miss ECMO patients at 5 years of age // Clin. Pediatr.– 2000.– Vol. 39.– P. 145–152.
7. Wolfson P.J. The development and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2003.– Vol. 76.– P. S2224–S2229.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Single-photon emission tomography in the evaluation of left ventricular postinfarction aneurysm
V.Yu. Kundin, B.M. Todurov, G.I. Kovtun, N.V. Ponich, O.P. Nadorak
References
1. Блеткин А.Н., Борисов И.А., Симоненко В.Б., Савичев Д.Д. Ремоделирование левого желудочка при осложненных формах ишемической болезни сердца // Укр. кардіол. журнал.– 2010.– № 11.– С. 24–33.
2. Бокерия Л.А., Бузиашвили Ю.И., Асымбекова Э.У. и др. Стресс-эхокардиография с добутамином в диагносцировании «спящего» (гибернированного) миокарда у больных ИБС с дисфункцией левого желудочка по результатам хирургического лечения // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия.– 1999.– № 2.– С. 5–10.
3. Бокерия Л.А., Федоров Г.Г. Опыт хирургического лечения постинфарктных аневризм левого желудочка сердца и сопутствующих желудочковых тахиаритмий (1981–1999 годы) // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. – 1999. – № 6. – С. 38–44.
4. Долженко М.Н. Аневризма левого желудочка: дефиниции, механизмы формирования, диагностика, показания к операции, прогноз // Серцева недостатність.– 2009.– № 2.– С. 28–37.
5. Солєйко О.В. Постінфарктна аневризма серця: шлях до істини крізь віки // Мистецтво лікування.– 2008.– № 5 (51).– С. 89–90.
6. Ходарева Е.Н., Сергеенко В.Б. Радионуклидные методы исследования в оценке жизнеспособности миокарда при обратимой левожелудочковой дисфункции // Вестник рентгенологии и радиологии.– 2001.– № 2.– С. 50–61.
7. Чернявский А.М., Караськов А.М. Предоперационное моделирование оптимального объема левого желудочка при хирургической реконструкции постинфарктных аневризм сердца // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. – 2000. – № 2. – С. 9–11.
8. Шумаков В.И., Казаков Э.Н., Хубутия А.Ш. и др. Ишемическая кардиомиопатия: значение оценки жизнеспособности миокарда для определения показаний к АКШ или трансплантации сердца // Грудная и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия.– 1999.– № 6.– С. 11–15.
9. Ba’albaki H.A., Clements S.D. Left ventricular aneurysm: a review // Clin.Cardiol.– 1989.– N 12.– P. 5–13.
10. Bogaert J., Rademakers F.E. Regional non-uniformity of normal adult human left ventricle // Amer. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. – 2001. – Vol. 280. – P. 610–620.
11. Bolognese L., Cerisano G., Buonamici P. Influence of infarct-zone viability on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction // Circulation. – 1997. – Vol. 96. – P. 3353–3359.
12. Sakaguchi F. Young R. L., Komeda M. Left ventricular aneurysm repair in rats: structural, functional and molecular consequences // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. – 2001. – Vol. 121. – P. 750–761.
13. Sutton M., Sharpe N. Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Pathophysiology and Therapy // Circulation.– 2000.– Vol. 101.– P. 2981–2987.
14. Voth E., Baer F.M., Theissen P. Dobutamine 99mTc-MIBI single-photon emission tomography: non-exercise dependent detection of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses // Eur. J. Nuc. Med.– 1994.– Vol. 21.– P. 537–544.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Estimation of the influence of the risk factors on direct and remote results of surgical modification of one-ventricular blood circulation
М.F. Zinkovsky, A.M. Dovgan, R.R. Sеydametov, V.V. Lazoryshynetz, B.V. Batsak, E.M. Trembovetskaya, B.B. Kravchuk, S.Ye. Dykukha, M.Yu. Atamanuk
References
1. Зиньковский М.Ф. Врожденные пороки сердца. Руководство.– К.: Книга-плюс, 2010.– 1200 с.
2. Choussat F., Fontan F., Besse P. et al. Selection criteria for Fontan’s procedure / // Pediatric Cardiology / Eds. R.H.Anderson, E.A. Shinebourne.– Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone, 1978.– P. 559–566.
3. Hosein R.B.M., Clarke A.J.B., McGuirk S.P. et al. Factors influencing early and late outcome following the Fontan procedure in the current era. The ‘Two Commandments’? // Eur. J. Cardiothoracic Surgery.– 2007.– N 31.– P. 344–353.
4. Jonas R. Comprehensive surgical management of congenital heart disease.– London UK: Hodder Publishing, 2004.– 460 р.
5. Khongphatthanayothin A., Rattanawilaisak K., Benjacholamas V. Clinical course and outcome of children with single ventricle physiology at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital // J. Med. Assoc. Thai.– 2006.– Vol. 89 (9).– P. 1420–1426.
6. Setty S.P., Herrington C.S. Fontan procedure: old lessons and new frontiers // Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther.– 2006.– Vol. 4 (4).– P. 515–521.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
The case of using the «chimney» technique in involuntary covering renal artery during abdominal aorta stenting
S.N. Furkalo
References
1. Allaqaband Suhail, Jan M. Fuad, Bajwa Tanvir. The chimney graft – A simple technique for endovascular repair of complex juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in no-option patients // J. Catheterizat. Cardiovasc. Intervent. – 2010. – Vol. 75, issue 7. – P. 1111–1115.
2. Kolvenbach R.R., Yoshida R., Pinter L. et al. Urgent endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysms using a sandwich technique and chimney grafts – a technical description // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surgery. – 2011. – Vol. 41, issue 1. – P. 54–60.
3. Kölbel T., Ohrlander T., Dias, N. et al. Der сhimney-graft // Gefässchirurgie. – 2009. – Vol. 14, issue 3. – P. 206–212.
4. Lioupis Ch., Abraham Ch.Z. Results and Challenges for the Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Aneurysms. // Perspectiv. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Therapy. – 2011. – Vol. 23, issue 3. – P.. 202–213.
5. Shahverdyan R., Gawenda M.. Brunkwall J. Triple-barrel Graft as a Novel Strategy to Preserve Supra-aortic Branches in Arch-TEVAR Procedures: Clinical Study and Systematic Review // Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. – 2013. – Vol. 45, issue 1. – P. 28–35.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis
N.V. Ponich, О.V. Stupak, О.А. Epanchintseva, О.J. Zharinov
References
1. Abdelmoneim S.S., Bernier M., Bellavia D. et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography in biopsy-proven primary cardiac amyloidosis // Eur. J. Echocard.– 2008.– Vol. 9.– P. 338–341.
2. Koyama J., Ray-Sequin P.A., Davidoff R. et al. Usefulness of pulsed tissue Doppler imaging for evaluating systolic and diastolic left ventricular function in patients with AL (primary) amyloidosis // Amer. J. Cardiol.– 2002.– Vol. 89.– P. 1067–1071.
3. Ozdemir B.H., Ozdemir F.N., Sezer S. et al. Among therapy modalities of end-stage renal disease, renal transplantation improves survival in patients with amyloidosis // Transplant. Proc.– 2006.– Vol. 38.– P. 432–434.
4. Falka R.H., Dubreyb S.W. Amyloid heart disease // Progress Cardiovasc. Dis.– 2010.– Vol. 52.– P. 347–361.
5. Damy T., Plante-Bordeneuve V., Valleix S. Diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis by magnetic resonance imaging due to a new mutation in the transthyretin gene // Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis.– 2012.– Vol. 105.– P. 614–615.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Endovascular closure of a post-traumatic ventricular septal defect with an occluder
B.M. Todurov, A.V. Khokhlov, M.V. Shimanko, A.A. Maksakov, L.A. Shapoval, Khorram Sohrab
References
1. Клевно В.А., Новоселов А.С. Анализ и структура закрытой тупой травмы грудной клетки и живота // Биомедицинский журнал.– 2003.– Т. 4.– C. 68–70.
2. Balzer D. Current status of percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defects // Pediatr. Therapeut.– 2012.–Vol. 2, Issue 2.– P. 100–112.
3. Berry C., Hillis W.S., Knight W.B. Transcatheter closure of a ventricular septal defect resulting from knife stabbing using the Amplatzer muscular VSD occluder // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2006.– Vol. 68 (1).– P. 153–156.
4. Carminati M., Butera G., Chessa M., Sievert H. Transcatheter closure of congenital ventricular septal defects: results of the European Registry // Eur. Heart J.– 2007.– Vol. 28 (19).– P. 2361-2368.
5. A., Piéchaud J.–F., Aviérinos J.–F. et al. Ann. Transcatheter closure of traumatic ventricular septal defect: an alternative to surgical repair? // Thorac. Surg.– 2002.– Vol. 74.– P. 582–584.
6. Guérina P., Langlardb J.–M., Rousselc J.–Ch. Transcatheter closure of a traumatic ventricular septal defect // Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis.– 2010.– Vol. 103, Issues 6–7.– P. 419–420.
7. Lock J.E., Block P.C., McKay R.G. et al. Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects // Circulation.– 1988.– Vol. 78.– P. 361–368.
8. Martinez M.W., Mookadam F., Sun Y., Hagler D.J. Transcatheter closure of ischemic and post-traumatic ventricular septal ruptures // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2007.– Vol. 69, Issue 3.– P. 403–407.
9. Schultz J.M., Trunkey D.D. Blunt cardiac injury // Crit. Care Clin.– 2004.– Vol. 20.– P. 57–70.
10. Suh W.M., Kern M.J. Transcatheter closure of a traumatic VSD in an adult requiring an ASD occluder device // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2009.– Vol. 74, Issue 7.– P. 1120–1125.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of left atrial myxoma: cases from practice
G.E. Rizk, E.A. Zakharyan, G.A. Stepuk, A.A. Snitser, R.S. Ovcharov, A.V. Ushakov
References
1. Бокерия Л.А., Малашенко А.И., Скопин И.И. и др. Хирургическое лечение приобретенных пороков и опухолей сердца у пациентов пожилого возраста // Бюллетень НЦССХ им. А.Н. Бакулева РАМН.– 2007.– Т. 8, № 3.– С. 25–28.
2. Витовский Р.М. Поражение клапанов сердца и их коррекция при миксомах // Укр. ревматол. журн.– 2002.– № 3.– С. 55–58.
3. Захарова В.П., Руденко Е.В., Галахин К.А., Буле P.M. Миксомы сердца (морфологические аспекты).– К.: Книга плюс, 2003.– 142 с.
4. Кнышов Г.В., Витовский Р.М., Захарова В.П. Опухоли сердца.– К., 2005.– 256 с.
5. Константинов Б.А., Нечаенко М.А., Кузнецова Л.М. и др. Клинико-диагностические и хирургические аспекты объемных образований сердца у детей и подростков // Хирургия.– 2007.– № 4.– С. 4–8.
6. Мухин Н.А., Моисеев С.В., Фомин В.В. Опухоли сердца // Болезни сердца: Руководство для врачей / Под ред. Р.Г. Огановой, И.Г. Фоминой. – М.: Литтерра, 2006.– С. 1106–1115.
7. Петров С.В., Райхлин Н.Т. Руководство по иммуногистохимической диагностике опухолей человека. – Казань: Титул, 2004.– 456 с.
8. Шиллер Н., Осипов М. А. Клиническая эхокардиография.– М.: Практика, 2005.– 344 c.
9. Acampa M., Tassi R., Guideri F. et al. Safety of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke caused by left atrial myxoma // Curr. Drug Saf.– 2011.– Vol. 6.– P. 343–345.
10. Beyder A., Klarich K.W. Large atrial myxoma causing dynamic obstruction of the mitral valve and atrial fibrillation // Mayo Clin. Proc.– 2012.– Vol. 87.– P. 122–130.
11. American cancer society. Cancer facts and figures.–Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc., 2007.– P. 56.
12. Gajjar T.P., Shah G.B. Giant ventricular myxoma obstructing right ventricular outflow tract // Rev. Bras. Cir. Cardiovasc.– 2011.– Vol. 26.– P. 663–666.
13. Harikrishnan S., Bohora S., Pillai V.V. et al. Left atrial myxoma – influence of tumour size on electrocardiographic findings // Indian Heart J.– 2012.– Vol. 64.– P. 170–172.
14. Messouak M., Zaam A., Maaroufi M. et al. Cardiac myxoma complicated with cerebral aneurysms and revealed by an ischemic stroke // Rev. Neurol. (Paris).– 2011.– Vol. 167.– P. 150–154.
15. Tay M.H., Lay K.W., Ding Z.P., Lee C.N. An interesting case of left atrial myxoma // Singapore Med. J.– 2002.– Vol. 43.– P. 367–368.
16. Vezzosi D., Vignaux O., Dupin N., Bertherat J. Carney complex: Clinical and genetic 2010 update // Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris).– 2010.– Vol. 71.– P. 486–493.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row CT Toshiba Aquilion ONE and challenging case scenarios
F.R. de Graaf, E. van der Wall
References
1. De Graaf F.R., Schuijf J.D., van Velzen J.E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease // Eur. Heart J.– 2010.– Vol. 31 (15).– P. 1908–1915.
2. De Graaf F.R., Schuijf J.D., van Velzen J.E. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis // Invest. Radiol.– 2010.– Vol. 45 (6).– P. 331–340.
3. De Graaf F.R., Schuijf J.D. Evaluation of stents and grafts // Euro Intervention.– 2010.– Vol. 6 (Suppl. G).– P. G48–G56.
4. Dewey M., Zimmermann E., Deissenrieder F. et al. Non-invasivecoronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation // Circulation.– 2009.– Vol. 120 (10).– P. 867–875.
5. George R.T., Arbab-Zadeh A., Miller J.M. et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia // Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging.– 2009.– Vol. 2 (3).– P. 174–182.
6. Malagutti P., Nieman K., Meijboom W.B. et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries // Eur. Heart J.– 2007.– Vol. 28 (15).– P.1879–1885.
7. Pasricha S.S., Nandurkar D., Seneviratne S.K. et al. Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience // Am. J. Roentgenol.– 2009.– Vol. 193 (6).– P. 1514–1521.
8. Uehara M., Funabashi N., Ueda M. et al. Quality of coronary arterial 320-slice computed tomography images in subjects with chronic atrial fibrillation compared with normal sinus rhythm // Int. J. Cardiol.– 2010.– Vol. 16.
[PDF] | [Contents] |
Almanac 2012 – adult cardiac surgery: the national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology
B. Bridgewater
References
1. Bridgewater B., Kinsman R., Walton P. et al. Demonstrating Quality; The Sixth National Annual Cardiac Database Report.– Henley-on-Thames: Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd, 2009.
2. El Bardissi A.W., Aranki S.F., Sheng S. et al. Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 143.– P. 273–281.
3. Bridgewater B. Cardiac registers: the adult cardiac surgery register // Heart.– 2010.– Vol. 96.– P. 1441–1443.
4. Serruys P.W., Morice M.C., Kappetein A.P. et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2009.– Vol. 360.– P. 961–972.
5. Kappetein A.P., Feldman T.E., Mack M.J. et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial // Eur. Heart. J.– 2011.– Vol. 32.– P. 2125–2134.
6. Weintraub W.S., Grau-Sepulveda M.V., Weiss J.M. et al. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2012.– Vol. 366.– P. 1467–1476.
7. Lee M.S., Yang T., Dhoot J. et al. Meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous coronary intervention and drug-eluting stents in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery narrowings // Amer. J. Cardiol.– 2010.– Vol. 105.– P. 1070–1075.
8. Naik H., White A.J., Chakravarty T. et al. A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2009.– Vol. 2.– P. 739–747.
9. Morice M.C., Serruys P.W., Kappetein A.P. et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial // Circulation.– 2010.– Vol. 121.– P. 2645–2653.
10. Park S.J., Kim Y.H., Park D.W. et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2011.– Vol. 364.– P. 1718–1727.
11. Boudriot E., Thiele H., Walther T. et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main stem stenosis // J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol.– 2011.– Vol. 57.– P. 538–545.
12. Capodanno D., Tamburino C. Unraveling the EXCEL: promises and challenges of the next trial of left main percutaneous coronary intervention // Int. J. Cardiol.– 2012.– Vol. 156.– P. 1–3.
13. Capodanno D., Caggegi A., Capranzano P. et al. Validating the EXCEL hypothesis: a propensity score matched 3-year comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in left main patients with SYNTAX score </¼32 // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2011.– Vol. 77.– P. 936–943.
14. Wijns W., Kolh P., Danchin N. et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization // Eur. Heart J.– 2010.– Vol. 31.– P. 2501–2555.
15. Ribichini F., Taggart D. Implications of new ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.– 2011.– Vol. 39.– P. 619–622.
16. Taggart D.P., Boyle R., de Belder M.A. et al. The 2010 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 445–446.
17. Falk V., Taggart D.P. NICE guidance for off-pump CABG: turn off the pump // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 1731–1733.
18. Pepper J.R. NICE guidance for off-pump CABG: keep the pump primed // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 1728–1730.
19. Shroyer A.L., Grover F.L., Hattler B. et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2009.– Vol. 361.– P. 1827–1837.
20. Puskas J.D., Mack M.J., Smith C.R. On-pump versus off-pump CABG // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2010.– Vol. 362.– P. 851.
21. Zenati M.A., Shroyer A.L., Collins J.F. et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2011.– Vol. 141.– P. 338–344.
22. Moller C.H., Perko M.J., Lund J.T. et al. Three-year follow-up in a subset of high-risk patients randomly assigned to off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Best Bypass Surgery trial // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 907–913.
23. Hueb W., Lopes N.H., Pereira A.C. et al. Five-year follow-up of a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump stable multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. The MASS III Trial // Circulation.– 2010.– Vol. 122 (Suppl. 11).–P. S48–52.
24. Lamy A., Devereaux P.J., Prabhakaran D. et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2012.– Vol. 366 (16).– P. 1489–1497.
25. Kuss O., von Salviati B., Borgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 140.– P. 829-835.
26. Puskas J.D., Thourani V.H., Kilgo P. et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass disproportionately benefits high-risk patients // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 88.– P. 1142–1147.
27. Angelini G.D., Culliford L., Smith D.K. et al. Effects of on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery on graft patency, survival, and health-related quality of life: long-term follow-up of 2 randomized controlled trials // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 137.– P. 295–303.
28. Anastasiadis K., Argiriadou H., Kosmidis M.H. et al. Neurocognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery using minimal versus conventional extracorporeal circulation: a randomised controlled pilot study // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 1082–1088.
29. Lopes R.D., Hafley G.E., Allen K.B. et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2009.– Vol. 361.– P. 235–244.
30. Grant S.W., Grayson A.D., Zacharias J. et al. What is the impact of endoscopic vein harvesting on clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft surgery? // Heart.– 2012.– Vol. 98.– P. 60–64.
31. Ouzounian M., Hassan A., Buth K.J. et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 89.– P. 403–408.
32. Taggart D.P., Altman D.G., Gray A.M. et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART) // Eur. Heart. J.– 2010.– Vol. 31.– P. 2470–2481.
33. Grau J.B., Ferrari G., Mak A.W. et al. Propensity matched analysis of bilateral internal mammary artery versus single left internal mammary artery grafting at 17-year follow-up: validation of a contemporary surgical experience // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 41.– P. 770–775.
34. Goldman S., Sethi G.K., Holman W. et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial // JAMA.– 2011.– Vol. 305.– P. 167–174.
35. Levisman J.M., Budoff M.J., Karlsberg R.P. Long-term coronary artery graft patency as evaluated by 64-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography // Coron. Artery Dis.– 2011.– Vol. 22.– P. 521–525.
36. Achouh P., Boutekadjirt R., Toledano D. et al. Long-term (5- to 20-year) patency of the radial artery for coronary bypass grafting // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 140.– P. 73–79.
37. Hayward P.A., Buxton B.F. The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction // Heart Lung Circ.– 2011.– Vol. 20.– P. 187–192.
38. Hayward P.A., Gordon I.R., Hare D.L. et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 139.– P. 60–65.
39. Pegg T.J., Maunsell Z., Karamitsos T.D. et al. Utility of cardiac biomarkers for the diagnosis of type V myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from serial cardiac MRI // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 810–816.
40. Westenbrink B.D., Kleijn L., de Boer R.A. et al. Sustained postoperative anaemia is associated with an impaired outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: insights from the IMAGINE trial // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 1590–1596.
41. Smith K.M., McKelvie R.S., Thorpe K.E. et al. Six-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial examining hospital versus home-based exercise training after coronary artery bypass graft surgery // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 1169–1174.
42. Velazquez E.J., Lee K.L., Deja M.A. et al. Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2011.– Vol. 364.– P. 1607–1616.
43. Bonow R.O., Maurer G., Lee K.L. et al. Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2011.– Vol. 364.– P. 1617–1625.
44. Mack M.J. Coronary artery disease: how should the STICH trial results affect clinical practice? // Nat. Rev. Cardiol.– 2011.– Vol. 8.– P. 427–428.
45. Velazquez E.J., Williams J.B., Yow E. et al. Long-term survival of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy treated by coronary artery bypass grafting versus medical therapy // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 93.– P. 523–530.
46. Brown J.M., O’Brien S.M., Wu C. et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 137.– P. 82–90.
47. Cockburn J., Trivedi U., Hildick-Smith D. Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation within a previous bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2011.– Vol. 78.– P. 479–484.
48. Dunning J., Gao H., Chambers J. et al. Aortic valve surgery: marked increases in volume and significant decreases in mechanical valve usedan analysis of 41,227 patients over 5 years from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National database // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2011.– Vol. 142.– P. 776–782.
49. Grant S.W., Devbhandari M.P., Grayson A.D. et al. What is the impact of providing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation service on conventional aortic valve surgical activity: patient risk factors and outcomes in the first 2 years // Heart.– 2010.– Vol. 96.– P. 1633–1637.
50. Kang D.H., Park S.J., Rim J.H. et al. Early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic very severe aortic stenosis // Circulation.– 2010.– Vol. 121.– P. 1502–1509.
51. Brown M.L., Pellikka P.A., Schaff H.V. et al. The benefits of early valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2008.– Vol. 135.– P. 308–315.
52. Le Tourneau T., Pellikka P.A., Brown M.L. et al. Clinical outcome of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis with medical and surgical management: importance of STS score at diagnosis // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 90.– P. 1876–1883.
53. Avakian S.D., Grinberg M., Ramires J.A. et al. Outcome of adults with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis // Int. J. Cardiol.– 2008.– Vol. 123.– P. 322–327.
54. Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2010.– Vol. 363.– P. 1597–1607.
55. Reynolds M.R., Magnuson E.A., Lei Y. et al. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis // Circulation.– 2011.– Vol. 124.– P. 1964–1972.
56. Reynolds M.R., Magnuson E.A., Wang K. et al. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard care among inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) trial (Cohort B) // Circulation.– 2012.– Vol. 125.– P. 1102–1109.
57. Smith C.R., Leon M.B., Mack M.J. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2011.– Vol. 364.– P. 2187–2198.
58. Kodali S.K., Williams M.R., Smith C.R. et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2012.– Vol. 366.– P. 1686–1695.
59. Moat N.E., Ludman P., de Belder M.A. et al. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry // J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol.– 2011.– Vol. 58.– P. 2130–2138.
60. Zahn R., Gerckens U., Grube E. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry // Eur. Heart J.– 2011.– Vol. 32.– P. 198–204.
61. Lefevre T., Kappetein A.P., Wolner E. et al. One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heart valve study // Eur. Heart J.– 2011.– Vol. 32.– P. 148–157.
62. Gilard M., Eltchaninoff H., Iung B. et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2012.– Vol. 366.– P. 1705–1715.
63. Ussia G.P., Barbanti M., Colombo A. et al. Impact of coronary artery disease in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insight from the Italian CoreValve Registry // Int. J. Cardiol.– Published Online First: 27 March 2012 PMID: 22459391.
64. Eltchaninoff H., Durand E., Borz B. et al. Prospective analysis of 30-day safety and performance of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Edwards SAPIEN XT versus SAPIEN prostheses // Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis.– 2012.– Vol. 105.– P. 132–140.
65. Bapat V., Khawaja M.Z., Attia R. et al. Transaortic Transcatheter Aortic valve implantation using Edwards Sapien valve: a novel approach // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2012.– Vol. 79.– P. 733–740.
66. Litzler P.Y., Borz B., Smail H. et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation in Rouen: four years’ experience with the Edwards transcatheter prosthesis // Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis.– 2012.– Vol. 105.– P. 141–145.
67. Murtuza B., Pepper J.R., Stanbridge R.D. et al. Minimal access aortic valve replacement: is it worth it? // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2008.– Vol. 85.– P. 1121–1131.
68. Brown M.L., McKellar S.H., Sundt T.M. et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 137.– P. 670–679.
69. Zannis K., Folliguet T., Laborde F. New sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: another tool in less invasive aortic valve replacement // Curr. Opin. Cardiol.– 2012.– Vol. 27.– P. 125–129.
70. Folliguet T.A., Laborde F., Zannis K. et al. Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 93.– P. 1483–1488.
71. Holmes D.R. Jr., Mack M.J., Kaul S. et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement // J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol.– 2012.– Vol. 59.– P. 1200–1254.
72. Dewey T.M., Herbert M.A., Ryan W.H. et al. Influence of surgeon volume on outcomes with aortic valve replacement // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 93.– P. 1107–1112.
73. Gammie J.S., Sheng S., Griffith B.P. et al. Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States: results from the Society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 87.– P. 1431–1437.
74. Anyanwu A.C., Bridgewater B., Adams D.H. The lottery of mitral valve repair surgery // Heart.– 2010.– Vol. 96.– P. 1964–1967.
75. Enriquez-Sarano M., Avierinos J.F., Messika-Zeitoun D. et al. Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation // N. Engl. J. Med.– 2005.– Vol. 352.– P. 875–883.
76. Kang D.H., Kim J.H., Rim J.H. et al. Comparison of early surgery versus conventional treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation // Circulation.– 2009.– Vol. 119.– P. 797–804.
77. Montant P., Chenot F., Robert A. et al. Long-term survival in asymptomatic patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation: a propensity score-based comparison between an early surgical strategy and a conservative treatment approach // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 138.– P. 1339–1348.
78. Rosenhek R., Rader F., Klaar U. et al. Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation // Circulation.– 2006.– Vol. 113.– P. 2238–2244.
79. Rosenhek R. Watchful waiting for severe mitral regurgitation // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.– 2011.– Vol. 23.– P. 203–208.
80. Bonow R.O., Carabello B.A., Kanu C. et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions and the Society of thoracic surgeons // Circulation.– 2006.– Vol. 114.– P. e84–231.
81. Bridgewater B., Hooper T., Munsch C. et al. Mitral repair best practice: proposed standards // Heart.– 2006.– Vol. 92.– P. 939–944.
82. Bolling S.F., Li S., O’Brien S.M. et al. Predictors of mitral valve repair: clinical and surgeon factors // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 90.– P. 1904–1911.
83. Gammie J.S., O’Brien S.M., Griffith B.P. et al. Influence of hospital procedural volume on care process and mortality for patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral regurgitation // Circulation.– 2007.– Vol. 115.– P. 881–887.
84. Perier P., Hohenberger W., Lakew F. et al. Toward a new paradigm for the reconstruction of posterior leaflet prolapse: midterm results of the «respect rather than resect» approach // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2008.– Vol. 86.– P. 718–725.
85. Gammie J.S., Bartlett S.T., Griffith B.P. Small-incision mitral valve repair: safe, durable, and approaching perfection // Ann. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 250.– P. 409–415.
86. Gammie J.S., Zhao Y., Peterson E.D. et al. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 90.– P. 1401–1408.
87. Modi P., Hassan A., Chitwood W.R. Jr. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.– 2008.– Vol. 34.– P. 943–952.
88. Cheng D.C., Martin J., Lal A. et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review // Innovations (Phila).– 2011.– Vol. 6.– P. 84–103.
89. Iribarne A., Russo M.J., Easterwood R. et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2010.– Vol. 90.– P. 1471–1477.
90. Whitlow P.L., Feldman T., Pedersen W.R. et al. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edgeto- Edge Repair) High Risk Study // J. Amer. Coll. Cardiol.– 2012.– Vol. 59.– P. 130–139.
91. Shahian D.M., Edwards F.H. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: introduction // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 88 (Suppl. 1).– P. S1.
92. O’Brien S.M., Shahian D.M., Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2eisolated valve surgery // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 88 (Suppl. 1).– P. S23–42.
93. Shahian D.M., O’Brien S.M., Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3evalve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 88 (Suppl. 1).– P. S43–62.
94. Shahian D.M., O’Brien S.M., Filardo G. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1ecoronary artery bypass grafting surgery // Ann. Thorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 88 (Suppl. 1).– P. 2–22.
95. Choong C.K., Sergeant P., Nashef S.A. et al. The EuroSCORE risk stratification system in the current era: how accurate is it and what should be done if it is inaccurate? // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.– 2009.– Vol. 35.– P. 59–61.
96. Nashef S.A., Roques F., Sharples L.D. et al. EuroSCORE II // Eur. J Cardiothorac. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 41.– P. 734–744.
97. Miceli A., Bruno V.D., Capoun R. et al. Mild renal dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery as a new risk factor for EuroSCORE // Heart.– 2011.– Vol. 97.– P. 362–365.
98. Sergeant P., Meuris B., Pettinari M. EuroSCORE II, illum qui est gravitates magni observe // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.– 2012.– Vol. 41.– P. 729–731. PAGE fraction trail=6 Almanac 2012
[PDF] | [Contents] |