ISSN 2305-3127 (Print)   
ISSN 2664-3790 (Online)

 

Chronic coronary occlusions in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Morphological features and a review of possible interventions

 S.М. Furkalo

References

  1. Alhejily WA, et al. Retrograde approach to coronary chronic total occlusion via an occluded saphenous bypass graft: a case report. Clin Case Rep. 2013;1(2):54-58.
  2.  Borges JC, et al. Five-year follow-up of angiographic disease progression after medicine, angioplasty, or surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:91.
  3. Brilakis ES, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(8):844-850.
  4. Brilakis ES, et al. Retrograde recanalization of native coronary artery chronic occlusions via acutely occluded vein grafts. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(1):109-113.
  5. Burke AP, et al. Pathophysiology of calcium deposition in coronary arteries. Herz. 2001;26(4):239-244.
  6. Chen L, et al. Angiographic features of vein grafts versus ungrafted coronary arteries in patients with unstable angina and previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(6):1493-1499.
  7. Chiu JJ, Chien S. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91(1):327-387.
  8. Goldman S, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(11):2149-2156.
  9. Hsu JT, et al. Impact of calcification length ratio on the intervention for chronic total occlusions. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011;150(2):135-141.
  10. Hwang M, et al. Progression of native coronary artery disease at 10 years: insights from a randomized study of medical versus surgical therapy for angina. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990;16(5):1066-1070.
  11. Joyal D, et al. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2010;160(1):179-187.
  12. Kitamura S. Physiological and metabolic effects of grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Circ J. 2011;75(4):766-772.
  13. Lee MS, et al. Saphenous vein graft intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(8):831-843.
  14.  Lichtenwalter C, et al. Dual guide catheter technique for treating native coronary artery lesions through tortuous internal mammary grafts: separating equipment delivery from target lesion visualization. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22(5):E78-81.
  15. Maurer BJ, et al. Changes in grafted and nongrafted coronary arteries following saphenous vein bypass grafting. Circulation. 1974;50(2):293-300.
  16. Marmagkiolis K, et al. Saphenous vein graft perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: a case series. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25(3):157-161.
  17. Michael TT, et al. Impact of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery on chronic total occlusion revascularisation: insights from a multicentre US registry. Heart. 2013;99(20):1515-1518.
  18. Michael TT, et al. Role of internal mammary artery bypass grafts in retrograde chronic total occlusion interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(7):359-362.
  19. Peterson ED, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(18):1923-1932.
  20. Rathore S, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(2):124-132.
  21. Sakakura K, et al. Comparison of pathology of chronic total occlusion with and without coronary artery bypass graft. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(25):1683-1693.
  22. Sekiguchi M, et al. Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention via critically degenerated saphenous vein grafts for chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries. WJCD. 2013;3(3):261-265.
  23. Sianos G, et al. Recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions: 2012 consensus document from the EuroCTO club. EuroIntervention. 2012;8(1):139-145.
  24. Tarr F.I, et al. Evidence of nitric oxide produced by the internal mammary artery graft in venous drainage of the recipient coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(5):1728-1731.
  25. Touma G, et al. Chronic total occlusions - Current techniques and future directions. IJC Heart & Vasculature. 2015;7:28-39.
  26. Torii S, et al. Retrograde approach via left internal mammary artery using a 5 Fr guiding catheter. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
  27. Varghese I, et al. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries vs. bypass grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009;10(2):103-109.
  28. Werner GS, et al. Effect of acetylcholine on arterial and venous grafts and coronary arteries in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 1990;11(2):127-137.
  29. Yang CF, et al. Successful Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusion in Native Coronary Arteries through an Occluded Saphenous Bypass Vein Graft: A Retrograde Alternative Approach. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014;30:485-489. 

 

[PDF] [Contents]  

  

Crossref Member Badge

© "Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology" Ukrainian scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal, 2023