Chronic total occlusion interventions in patients with coronary artery disease. When to stop and when to start again?

S.M. Furkalo

References

  1. Фуркало С.Н. Хронические коронарные окклюзии у больных после аортокоронарного шунтирования. Морфологические особенности и обзор возможных инвазивных вмешательств // Кардіохірургія та інтервенційна кардіологія.– 2017.– № 3.– С. 5–13.
  2.  Brilakis E.S., Mashayekhi K., Tsuchikane E. et al. Guiding principles for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions // Circulation.– 2019.– Vol. 140.– P. 420–433. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039797.
  3. Galassi A.R., Werner G.S., Boukhris M. et al. Percutaneous recanalisation of chronic total occlusions: 2019 consensus document from the EuroCTO Club // EuroIntervention.– 2019.– Vol. 15.– P. 198–208. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00826.
  4. Harding S.A., Wu E.B., Lo S. et al. A new algorithm for crossing chronic total occlusions from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.– 2017.– Vol. 10.– P. 2135–2143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.071.
  5.  Joyal D., Afilalo J., Rinfret S. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Am. Heart J.– 2010.– Vol. 160.– P. 179–187. doi: 10.1016/ j.ahj.2010.04.015.
  6. Karacsonyi J., Karatasakis A.D Karmpaliotis  et al. Effect of Previous Failure on Subsequent Procedural Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from a Contemporary Multicenter Registry) // Am. J. Cardiol. 2016.– Vol. 117 (8).– P. 1267–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.021.
  7.  Karacsonyi J., Vemmou E., Nikolakopoulos I.D. et al. Complications of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention // Neth. Heart J.– 2021.– Vol. 29.– P. 60–67. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01502-1.
  8. Khan M.F., Wendel C.S., Thai H.M., Movahed M.R. Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2013.– Vol. 82.– P. 95–107. doi: 10.1002/ ccd.24863.
  9.  Morino Y., Abe M., Morimoto T. et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.– 2011.– Vol. 4.– P. 213–221. doi: 10.1016/ j.jcin.2010.09.024.
  10. Rinfret S., Harding S.A. A new Japanese CTO algorithm: a step forward or backward? // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 2019.– Vol. 74.– P. 2405–2409. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1048.
  11. Syrseloudis D., Secco G.G., Barrero E.A. et al. Increase in J-CTO lesion complexity score explains the disparity between recanalisation success and evolution of chronic total occlusion strategies: insights from a single-centre 10-year experience // Heart.– 2013.– Vol. 99.– P. 474–479. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303205.
  12. Wu E.B., Tsuchikane E., Lo S. et al. Chronic total occlusion wiring: a state-of-the-art guide from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club // Heart Lung. Circ.– 2019.– Vol. 28.– P. 1490–1500. doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.04.004.
  13. Wu E.B., Tsuchikane E., Ge L. et al. Retrograde versus antegrade approach for coronary chronic total occlusion in an algorithm-driven contemporary Asia-Pacific Multicentre Registry: comparison of outcomes // Heart Lung. Circ.– 2020.– Vol. 29.– P. 894–903. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.188. 
  14. Wu E.B., Brilakis E.S., Mashayekhi K. et al. Global chronic total occlusion crossing algorithm JACC State-of-the-Art Review // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.– 2021.– Vol. 78.– P. 840–853. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.055.
  15. Xenogiannis I., Tajti P., Hall A.B.  et al. Update on cardiac catheterization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv.– 2019.– Vol. 17.– P. 1635–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.051. 
[PDF] [Contents]